2016-10-07.226 Neptune
0.38304
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T20:30:32
2016-10-07T20:32:02
153.230824
40.487805
-0.2
0.0
-0.4
9.8
2.4e+01
✘ 42.7 MB
✔
(check focus Z after the small focus X adjustment)
2016-10-07.227 Neptune
0.355765
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T20:32:04
2016-10-07T20:33:15
153.60203
40.600119
-0.2
0.0
-1.2
9.8
2.4e+01
✘ 33.8 MB
✔
—
2016-10-07.228 Neptune
0.355765
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T20:33:16
2016-10-07T20:34:25
153.966118
40.70068
-0.2
0.0
-0.8
9.8
2.4e+01
✘ 33.2 MB
✔
—
2016-10-07.229 Neptune
0.355765
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T20:34:27
2016-10-07T20:35:37
154.328248
40.800634
-0.2
0.0
-6e-09
9.8
2.4e+01
✘ 33.2 MB
✔
—
2016-10-07.230 Neptune
0.361273
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T20:35:39
2016-10-07T20:36:49
154.683158
40.910132
-0.2
0.0
0.4
9.8
2.4e+01
✘ 34.6 MB
✔
set focus -0.4 => OK no focus Z change introduced by the (small) X focus
2016-10-07.231 Neptune
0.368448
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T20:41:12
2016-10-07T21:14:33
166.94287
43.425239
-0.2
0.0
-0.4
9.8
2.4e+01
✔ 933.1 MB
✔
@beammap1scan
(sky seems still too unstable to start the pointing session; not ideal iether for a bammap to look at beams, but at least to monitor kid stability and synchronization). Ooops we forgot we were still on Neptune, not on Uranus... well, let see what it gives.
2016-10-07.238 Uranus
0.444304
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T22:11:29
2016-10-07T22:12:58
123.693231
47.500877
-0.2
0.0
-0.4
1.6e+01
2.1e+01
✘ 42.2 MB
✔
—
2016-10-07.239 Uranus
0.444304
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T22:12:59
2016-10-07T22:14:11
124.034047
47.693716
-0.2
0.0
-1.2
1.6e+01
2.1e+01
✘ 34.5 MB
✔
—
2016-10-07.240 Uranus
0.444304
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T22:14:13
2016-10-07T22:15:23
124.3699
47.891474
-0.2
0.0
-0.8
1.6e+01
2.1e+01
✘ 33.0 MB
✔
—
2016-10-07.241 Uranus
0.462252
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T22:15:25
2016-10-07T22:16:36
124.710273
48.092544
-0.2
0.0
-6e-09
1.6e+01
2.1e+01
✘ 34.5 MB
✔
—
2016-10-07.242 Uranus
0.462252
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T22:16:38
2016-10-07T22:17:49
125.045319
48.288216
-0.2
0.0
0.4
1.6e+01
2.1e+01
✘ 35.2 MB
✔
set focus -0.6
2016-10-07.244 Uranus
0.460436
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T22:28:50
2016-10-07T23:02:05
139.379951
54.898009
-0.2
0.0
-0.6
1.7e+01
1.5e+01
✔ 929.5 MB
✔
do a beam map teh time to look into the code and try to understand why we don' t see few Jy sources on the cross scans.
==> we find nothing really odd in the code. looking closer at TOI obtained on 227-088, Uranus and Neptune, we see sky fluctuations are huge, so maybe the sky is fluctuating too much to get anything else than >10Jys source ???
2016-10-07.26 Uranus
0.259869
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T02:53:15
2016-10-07T02:54:35
236.320945
47.13163
-0.4
0.0
-0.3
2.4e+01
-7.4
✘ 38.1 MB
✔
reasonable fit !!!
rta said set pointing 22.9 -8.8
-------------------------------------------------------------------
If profiles cannot be used, then you may try values derived on the maps:
Array 1: set pointing 24.6 -7.6
Array 2: set pointing 24.8 -9.2
Array 3: set pointing 24.5 -9.4
2016-10-07.27 Uranus
0.259869
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T02:54:36
2016-10-07T02:55:47
236.650524
46.928394
-0.4
0.0
-1.1
2.4e+01
-7.4
✘ 33.2 MB
✔
scan using set pointing 0 0 (we get desperate from scan 17 before seeing the good fit of scan 18)
then we set set pointing 22.9 -8.8
2016-10-07.28 Uranus
0.259869
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T02:55:48
2016-10-07T02:56:58
236.970509
46.725987
-0.4
0.0
-0.7
2.4e+01
-7.4
✘ 33.0 MB
✔
—
2016-10-07.29 Uranus
0.259869
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T02:56:59
2016-10-07T02:58:10
237.284851
46.523207
-0.4
0.0
0.1
2.4e+01
-7.4
✘ 34.5 MB
✔
we picked a strong pointing source with flux from 2 to 4 Jy at 1mm;
we got bad fit using the kid ref profile despite few change in elevation; moreover, the ref red is very close to on-source on the map: we didn't know what to do...
we will relaunch after a track for checking
2016-10-07.30 Uranus
0.259198
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T02:58:12
2016-10-07T02:59:21
237.595619
46.325234
-0.4
0.0
0.5
2.4e+01
-7.4
✘ 33.9 MB
✔
set focus -0.2
Flux A1: -0.25
FWHM A1: -0.26
Ellipticity A1: -0.32
Flux A2: -0.20
FWHM A2: -0.11
Ellipticity A2: -1.67
Flux A3: -0.16
FWHM A3: -0.10
Ellipticity A3: -0.11
2016-10-07.43 Uranus
0.256818
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-07T04:03:53
2016-10-07T04:15:39
254.149135
32.380436
-0.4
0.0
-0.2
2.2e+01
-1.0
✘ 324.8 MB
✔
canceled (unnecessarily) due to a doubt on the pako version
NB: if we were using the previous (subscan < 100) version, we would have got an error message and the scan couldn't have started.
2016-10-08.12 Uranus
0.36097
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-08T01:41:06
2016-10-08T01:42:27
213.740758
56.841659
-0.2
0.0
-0.6
2e+01
1.3e+01
✘ 38.7 MB
✔
@focusOTF-Z 1/5
2016-10-08.13 Uranus
0.36097
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-08T01:42:29
2016-10-08T01:43:42
214.230173
56.707398
-0.2
0.0
-1.4
2e+01
1.3e+01
✘ 34.5 MB
✔
@focusOTF-Z 2/5
2016-10-08.14 Uranus
0.388803
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-08T01:43:43
2016-10-08T01:44:53
214.706667
56.570358
-0.2
0.0
-1.0
2e+01
1.3e+01
✘ 33.3 MB
✔
@focusOTF-Z 3/5
2016-10-08.15 Uranus
0.388803
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-08T01:44:54
2016-10-08T01:46:05
215.18346
56.433667
-0.2
0.0
-0.2
2e+01
1.3e+01
✘ 33.8 MB
✔
@focusOTF-Z 4/5
2016-10-08.16 Uranus
0.388803
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-08T01:46:07
2016-10-08T01:47:19
215.668289
56.290587
-0.2
0.0
0.2
2e+01
1.3e+01
✘ 35.3 MB
✔
we use set focus -0.35
Flux A1: -0.39
FWHM A1: -0.40
Ellipticity A1: -0.39
Flux A2: -0.42
FWHM A2: -0.39
Ellipticity A2: -0.28
Flux A3: -0.26
FWHM A3: -0.29
Ellipticity A3: -0.24
2016-10-08.17 Uranus
0.385409
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-08T01:52:17
2016-10-08T01:53:42
218.132973
55.519966
-0.2
0.0
-0.35
2e+01
1.3e+01
✘ 40.0 MB
✔
focus x
2016-10-08.18 Uranus
0.385409
onTheFlyMap
2016-10-08T01:53:43
2016-10-08T01:54:42
218.516462
55.378475
-3.2
0.0
-0.35
2e+01
1.3e+01
✘ 28.2 MB
✔
—